Agriculture · 2025
Peak Soil Erosion Risk in Mixed Forests: A Critical Transition Phase Driven by Moso Bamboo Expansion
Wang, J., Wang, X., Yan, Y., Wang, L., Hu, H., Ma, B., Zhou, H., Liu, J., Gan, F., Fan, Y.
Export
Peak Soil Erosion Risk in Mixed Forests: A Critical Transiti…
Abstract
Driven by climate change and human activities, the expansion of highly invasive moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) into coniferous forests induces a serious ecological imbalance. Its rapidly spreading underground roots significantly alter soil structure, yet the mechanisms by which this expansion affects soil detachment capacity (Dc), a key soil erosion parameter, remain unclear. While bamboo expansion modifies soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics, influencing Dc and, consequently, soil erosion resistance, the underlying mechanisms, particularly stage-specific variations, are not thoroughly understood. In this study, we examined Japanese white pine (Pinus parviflora Siebold & Zucc.) forest (CF), moso bamboo–Japanese white pine mixed forest (MF), and moso bamboo forest (BF) as representative stages of bamboo expansion. By integrating laboratory-controlled measurements of soil physicochemical properties and root traits with field-based flume experiments, we comprehensively investigate the effects of moso bamboo expansion into CF on soil detachment capacity. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) Expansion of moso bamboo significantly changed soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics. Soil bulk density was the highest in the MF (1.13 g·cm−3), followed by the CF (1.08 g·cm−3) and BF (1.03 g·cm−3); non-capillary porosity increased significantly with expansion (CF 0.03% to MF 0.10%); and although the stability of aggregates (MWD) increased by 24.5% from the CF to MF, root mass density (RMD) in the MF (0.0048 g·cm−3) was much higher than that in the CF (0.0009 g·cm−3). This intense root competition between forest types, combined with increased macroporosity development, compromised overall soil structural integrity. This weakening may lead to a looser soil structure during the transition phase, thereby increasing erosion risk. (2) There were significant stage differences in Dc: it was significantly higher in the MF (0.034 kg·m−2·s−1) than in the CF (0.023 kg·m−2·s−1) and BF (0.018 kg·m−2·s−1), which revealed that the MF was an erosion-sensitive stage. (3) Our Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) results revealed that soil physicochemical properties (soil moisture content and soil total nitrogen) dominated Dc changes through direct effects (total effect −0.547); in comparison, root properties indirectly affected Dc by modulating soil structure (indirect effect: −0.339). The results of this study reveal the dynamics and mechanisms of Dc changes during bamboo expansion, and for the first time, we identify a distinct Dc peak during the mixed forest transition phase. These findings provide a scientific basis for moso bamboo forest management, soil erosion risk assessment, and optimization of soil and water conservation strategies.
Show all
Driven by climate change and human activities, the expansion of highly invasive moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) into coniferous forests induces a serious ecological imbalance. Its rapidly spreading underground roots significantly alter soil structure, yet the mechanisms by which this expansion affects soil detachment capacity (Dc), a key soil erosion parameter, remain unclear. While bamboo expansion modifies soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics, influencing Dc and, consequently, soil erosion resistance, the underlying mechanisms, particularly stage-specific variations, are not thoroughly understood. In this study, we examined Japanese white pine (Pinus parviflora Siebold & Zucc.) forest (CF), moso bamboo–Japanese white pine mixed forest (MF), and moso bamboo forest (BF) as representative stages of bamboo expansion. By integrating laboratory-controlled measurements of soil physicochemical properties and root traits with field-based flume experiments, we comprehensively investigate the effects of moso bamboo expansion into CF on soil detachment capacity. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) Expansion of moso bamboo significantly changed soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics. Soil bulk density was the highest in the MF (1.13 g·cm−3), followed by the CF (1.08 g·cm−3) and BF (1.03 g·cm−3); non-capillary porosity increased significantly with expansion (CF 0.03% to MF 0.10%); and although the stability of aggregates (MWD) increased by 24.5% from the CF to MF, root mass density (RMD) in the MF (0.0048 g·cm−3) was much higher than that in the CF (0.0009 g·cm−3). This intense root competition between forest types, combined with increased macroporosity development, compromised overall soil structural integrity. This weakening may lead to a looser soil structure during the transition phase, thereby increasing erosion risk. (2) There were significant stage differences in Dc: it was significantly higher in the MF (0.034 kg·m−2·s−1) than in the CF (0.023 kg·m−2·s−1) and BF (0.018 kg·m−2·s−1), which revealed that the MF was an erosion-sensitive stage. (3) Our Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) results revealed that soil physicochemical properties (soil moisture content and soil total nitrogen) dominated Dc changes through direct effects (total effect −0.547); in comparison, root properties indirectly affected Dc by modulating soil structure (indirect effect: −0.339). The results of this study reveal the dynamics and mechanisms of Dc changes during bamboo expansion, and for the first time, we identify a distinct Dc peak during the mixed forest transition phase. These findings provide a scientific basis for moso bamboo forest management, soil erosion risk assessment, and optimization of soil and water conservation strategies.
Driven by climate change and human activities, the expansion of highly invasive moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) into coniferous forests induces a serious ecological imbalance. Its rapidly spreading underground roots significantly alter soil structure, yet the mechanisms by which this expansion affects soil detachment capacity (Dc), a key soil erosion parameter, remain unclear. While bamboo expansion modifies soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics, influencing Dc and, consequently, soil erosion resistance, the underlying mechanisms, particularly stage-specific variations, are not thoroughly understood. In this study, we examined Japanese white pine (Pinus parviflora Siebold & Zucc.) forest (CF), moso bamboo–Japanese white pine mixed forest (MF), and moso bamboo forest (BF) as representative stages of bamboo expansion. By integrating laboratory-controlled measurements of soil physicochemical properties and root traits with field-based flume experiments, we comprehensively investigate the effects of moso bamboo expansion into CF on soil detachment capacity. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) Expansion of moso bamboo significantly changed soil physicochemical properties and root characteristics. Soil bulk density was the highest in the MF (1.13 g·cm−3), followed by the CF (1.08 g·cm−3) and BF (1.03 g·cm−3); non-capillary porosity increased significantly with expansion (CF 0.03% to MF 0.10%); and although the stability of aggregates (MWD) increased by 24.5% from the CF to MF, root mass density (RMD) in the MF (0.0048 g·cm−3) was much higher than that in the CF (0.0009 g·cm−3). This intense root competition between forest types, combined with increased macroporosity development, compromised overall soil structural integrity. This weakening may lead to a looser soil structure during the transition phase, thereby increasing erosion risk. (2) There were significant stage differences in Dc: it was significantly higher in the MF (0.034 kg·m−2·s−1) than in the CF (0.023 kg·m−2·s−1) and BF (0.018 kg·m−2·s−1), which revealed that the MF was an erosion-sensitive stage. (3) Our Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) results revealed that soil physicochemical properties (soil moisture content and soil total nitrogen) dominated Dc changes through direct effects (total effect −0.547); in comparison, root properties indirectly affected Dc by modulating soil structure (indirect effect: −0.339). The results of this study reveal the dynamics and mechanisms of Dc changes during bamboo expansion, and for the first time, we identify a distinct Dc peak during the mixed forest transition phase. These findings provide a scientific basis for moso bamboo forest management, soil erosion risk assessment, and optimization of soil and water conservation strategies.
Findings
What changed what, as the paper reports it. Grouped by the measured property. The largest groups are open; open the others as you need them.
non-capillary porosity
↑ 11
- increase
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF vsCF;Figure3c a/a vs b; prose porosity numbers inconsistent
Source · p. 7 “Non-capillary porosity increased significantly with expansion”
water-stable MWD
↑ 11
- increase
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;Figure4b wetCFc/MFb/BFa;MF/BF separately tested
Source · p. 7 “both water-stable and non-water-stable aggregates in coniferous forests showed a marked decrease in mean weight diameter (p \< 0.05).”
dry-sieved MWD
↑ 11
- increase
BF, pure moso bamboo forest vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · dry-sieved MWD: BF and MF both a, CF b (Fig 4b)
Source · p. 7 “both water-stable and non-water-stable aggregates in coniferous forests showed a marked decrease in mean weight diameter (p \< 0.05).”
root mass density
↑ 11
- increase
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;Figure5 MFb/BFa versusCFc;Results numbers retained, contradictoryConclusion numbers omitted
Numbers
- treatment 0.0048 vs. control 0.0009 g cm-3 (+433.3 %) · MF vsCF
- treatment 0.0184 vs. control 0.0009 g cm-3 (+1,944 %) · BF vsCF
Source · p. 9 “TherootmassdensityoftheBF(0.0184g”
Source · p. 9 “followedbytheMF(0.0048g”
Source · p. 9 “and the lowest was noted in the CF (0.0009 g·cm−3”
soil pH
↑ 11
- increase
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF vsCF;Table2 values override prose
Numbers
- treatment 5.16 vs. control 4.17 (+23.74 %) · MF
- treatment 5.41 vs. control 4.17 (+29.74 %) · BF
Source · p. 9 “pH | 4.17 ± 0.10 c | 5.16 ± 0.08 b | 5.41 ± 0.06 a”
SOC
↓ 11
- decrease
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF vsCF
Numbers
- treatment 2.75 vs. control 3.46 g kg-1 (-20.52 %) · MF
- treatment 2.59 vs. control 3.46 g kg-1 (-25.14 %) · BF
Source · p. 9 “SOC (g · kg − 1 ) | 3.46 ± 0.85 a | 2.75 ± 0.64 b | 2.59 ± 0.47 b”
total phosphorus
↓ 11
- decrease
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF vsCF
Numbers
- treatment 14.08 vs. control 18 g kg-1 (-21.78 %) · MF
- treatment 12.42 vs. control 18 g kg-1 (-31 %) · BF
Source · p. 9 “P (g · kg − 1 ) | 18.00 ± 5.24 a | 14.08 ± 2.74 b | 12.42 ± 1.25 b”
ammonium nitrogen
↑ 11
- increase
BF, pure moso bamboo forest vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;BF vsCF
Numbers
- treatment 14.24 vs. control 7.65 mg kg-1 (+86.14 %)
Source · p. 9 “7.65 ± 3.56 b | 8.13 ± 1.79 b | 14.24 ± 6.72 a”
C/N
↓ 11
- decrease
BF, pure moso bamboo forest vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;BF vs originalCF;MF also sharesCFa
Numbers
- treatment 14.22 vs. control 19.86 (-28.4 %)
Source · p. 9 “C/N | 19.86 ± 3.71 a | 20.89 ± 3.01 a | 14.22 ± 3.37 b”
soil detachment capacity
↑ 11
- increase
MF, mixed moso bamboo–Japanese white pine forest vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm intact rooted soil;standardized flume5/10/15degrees and0.24/0.36/0.48L s-1;MF a/CFb Figure6a;not natural field runoff flux
Numbers
- treatment 0.034 vs. control 0.023 kg m-2 s-1 (+47.83 %)
Source · p. 9 “TheMFexhibitedthehighestDc(0.034kg”
Source · p. 9 “significantlysurpassingboththeCF(0.023kg”
soil moisture content
↓ 11
- decrease
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;Figure3b MFc/BFb vs CFa; moisture content, not a separately measured capacity
Numbers
- treatment 9.41 vs. control 23.71 % (-60.31 %) · MF
Source · p. 7 “soil moisture content dropped sharply to 9.41% in the MF (CF: 23.71% ± 2.1%)”
total potassium
= 11
- no effect
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestnot significant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF separate pairs all a
Numbers
- treatment 23.66 vs. control 22.16 g kg-1 (+6.769 %) · MF
- treatment 18.42 vs. control 22.16 g kg-1 (-16.88 %) · BF
Source · p. 9 “K (g · kg − 1 ) | 22.16 ± 8.17 a | 23.66 ± 8.78 a | 18.42 ± 9.22 a”
available potassium
= 11
- no effect
MF and BF, agreeing expansion variants vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestnot significant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF/BF separate pairs all a
Numbers
- treatment 103.6 vs. control 104.5 mg kg-1 (-0.8612 %) · MF
- treatment 105.1 vs. control 104.5 mg kg-1 (+0.5933 %) · BF
Source · p. 9 “AK (mg · kg − 1 ) | 104.5 ± 8.15 a | 103.6 ± 11.49 a | 105.12 ± 13.66 a”
total nitrogen
↓ 11
- decrease
MF, mixed moso bamboo–Japanese white pine forest vs. CF, Japanese white pine forestsignificant · 0–10 cm · Yili mountainous area · 0–10cm;MF vsCF;BF sharesCFa and not included
Numbers
- treatment 0.13 vs. control 0.17 g kg-1 (-23.53 %)
Source · p. 9 “N (g · kg − 1 ) | 0.17 ± 0.03 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 b | 0.19 ± 0.04 a”
Set-up
Treatments
- moso bamboo expansion stageLand use
- CF, Japanese white pine forestConiferous forestMF, mixed moso bamboo–Japanese white pine forestMixed forestBF, pure moso bamboo forestForestsMF and BF, agreeing expansion variantsForests
Measured
- bulk density
- Unit
- g cm-3
- Method
- cutting ring
- non-capillary porosityMacroporosity
- Unit
- %
- Method
- saturation/free drainage cutting ring; prose percentages conflict with graph
- water-stable MWDWater-stable aggregate mean weight diameter (MWD)
- Unit
- mm
- dry-sieved MWDAggregate mean weight diameter (MWD)
- Unit
- mm
- root mass densityRoot biomass
- Unit
- g cm-3
- Method
- washed roots oven-dried; mass/core volume
- soil pHpH
- Method
- potentiometric; extractant unspecified
- SOCSoil organic carbon
- Unit
- g kg-1
- Method
- elemental analyzer
- total phosphorus
- Unit
- g kg-1
- Method
- UV-Vis spectrophotometry
- ammonium nitrogenNH4+/Ammonia
- Unit
- mg kg-1
- C/NC:N ratio
- soil detachment capacityErosion
- Unit
- kg m-2 s-1
- Method
- eroded dry mass per core area and time under standardized flume scouring of intact rooted0–10cm soil; capacity not measured field runoff loss
- soil moisture contentGravimetric water content
- Unit
- %
- Method
- (moist mass minus dry mass)/dry soil mass; equation5
- total potassiumTotal Potassium/Total K
- Unit
- g kg-1
- Method
- atomic absorption spectrophotometry
- available potassiumExchangeable/available potassium
- Unit
- mg kg-1
- Method
- atomic absorption spectrophotometry; extractant unspecified
- total nitrogen
- Unit
- g kg-1
- Method
- elemental analyzer
Sites
Yili mountainous area
- Location
- Yili mountainous area, Jiangsu Province, China31.20° N, 119.65° E
- Climate
- 15.8 °C mean annual temperature1,277 mm annual precipitation
- Land use
- Japanese white pine forestConiferous forest, mixed bamboo–pine forestMixed forest, pure moso bamboo forestForests
Similar papers
Responses of soil aggregates, organic carbon, and crop yield to short-term intermittent deep tillage in Southern China
Hu et al. · 2021 · Journal of Cleaner Production
9 shared concepts
7 findings3 sites
Black Soil Quality After 19 Years of Continuous Conservation Tillage
Zhang et al. · 2024 · Agronomy
8 shared concepts
29 findings1 site
Deep Plowing Increases Subsoil Carbon Accrual Through Enhancing Macroaggregate Protection in a Mollisol with Two Different Tillage Regimes
Chen et al. · 2026 · Agronomy
8 shared concepts
42 findings1 site
Straw Deep Burial and Returning to Farmland: Mechanistic Study on Enhancing Albic Soil Fertility
Wang et al. · 2025 · Agronomy
7 shared concepts
21 findings1 site
Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties
de Cárcer et al. · 2019 · Soil and Tillage Research
8 shared concepts
12 findings1 site
