Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · 2023
Soil nitrogen and carbon storages and carbon pool management index under sustainable conservation tillage strategy
Yuan, J., Liang, Y., Zhuo, M., Sadiq, M., Liu, L., Wu, J., Xu, G., Liu, S., Li, G., Yan, L.
Export
Soil nitrogen and carbon storages and carbon pool management…
Abstract
Agricultural practices are significant to increase the soil nitrogen and organic carbon sequestration to adapt and mitigate the climate change in a recent climate change scenario. With this background, we carried out research in the Longzhong Loess Plateau region of China. This research was conducted under a randomized complete block design, with three replicates. Adopt the method of combining outdoor positioning field test with indoor index measurement to explore the soil bulk density (BD), nitrogen components ( viz., nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 − -N), ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 + -N), total nitrogen (TN), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and nitrogen storage (NS), and carbon components [ viz., soil organic carbon (SOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and carbon storage (CS), carbon pool index (CPI), carbon pool activity (A) and carbon pool activity index (AI) and carbon pool management index (CPMI)] and C/N, ratio under different tillage practices [ namely., conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), straw mulch with conventional tillage (CTS) and straw mulch with no tillage (NTS)]. Our results depicted that different conservation tillage systems significantly increased soil BD over conventional tillage. Compared with CT, the NTS, CTS and NT reduced soil NO 3 − -N, increased the soil NH 4 + -N, TN, MBN and NS, among them, NS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 25.0, 14.8 and 13.1% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Additionally, conservation tillage significantly increased SOC, EOC, MBC, CS, CPI, AI, CPMI and C/N, ratio than CT. Inside, CS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 19.4, 12.1 and 13.4% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Moreover, during the 3-year study period, the CPMI under NTS treatment was the largest (139.26, 140.97, and 166.17). Consequently, we suggest that NTS treatment was more sustainable strategy over other investigated conservation tillage practices and should be recommended as climate mitigation technique under climate change context.
Show all
Agricultural practices are significant to increase the soil nitrogen and organic carbon sequestration to adapt and mitigate the climate change in a recent climate change scenario. With this background, we carried out research in the Longzhong Loess Plateau region of China. This research was conducted under a randomized complete block design, with three replicates. Adopt the method of combining outdoor positioning field test with indoor index measurement to explore the soil bulk density (BD), nitrogen components ( viz., nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 − -N), ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 + -N), total nitrogen (TN), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and nitrogen storage (NS), and carbon components [ viz., soil organic carbon (SOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and carbon storage (CS), carbon pool index (CPI), carbon pool activity (A) and carbon pool activity index (AI) and carbon pool management index (CPMI)] and C/N, ratio under different tillage practices [ namely., conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), straw mulch with conventional tillage (CTS) and straw mulch with no tillage (NTS)]. Our results depicted that different conservation tillage systems significantly increased soil BD over conventional tillage. Compared with CT, the NTS, CTS and NT reduced soil NO 3 − -N, increased the soil NH 4 + -N, TN, MBN and NS, among them, NS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 25.0, 14.8 and 13.1% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Additionally, conservation tillage significantly increased SOC, EOC, MBC, CS, CPI, AI, CPMI and C/N, ratio than CT. Inside, CS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 19.4, 12.1 and 13.4% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Moreover, during the 3-year study period, the CPMI under NTS treatment was the largest (139.26, 140.97, and 166.17). Consequently, we suggest that NTS treatment was more sustainable strategy over other investigated conservation tillage practices and should be recommended as climate mitigation technique under climate change context.
Agricultural practices are significant to increase the soil nitrogen and organic carbon sequestration to adapt and mitigate the climate change in a recent climate change scenario. With this background, we carried out research in the Longzhong Loess Plateau region of China. This research was conducted under a randomized complete block design, with three replicates. Adopt the method of combining outdoor positioning field test with indoor index measurement to explore the soil bulk density (BD), nitrogen components ( viz., nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 − -N), ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 + -N), total nitrogen (TN), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and nitrogen storage (NS), and carbon components [ viz., soil organic carbon (SOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and carbon storage (CS), carbon pool index (CPI), carbon pool activity (A) and carbon pool activity index (AI) and carbon pool management index (CPMI)] and C/N, ratio under different tillage practices [ namely., conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), straw mulch with conventional tillage (CTS) and straw mulch with no tillage (NTS)]. Our results depicted that different conservation tillage systems significantly increased soil BD over conventional tillage. Compared with CT, the NTS, CTS and NT reduced soil NO 3 − -N, increased the soil NH 4 + -N, TN, MBN and NS, among them, NS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 25.0, 14.8 and 13.1% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Additionally, conservation tillage significantly increased SOC, EOC, MBC, CS, CPI, AI, CPMI and C/N, ratio than CT. Inside, CS under NTS, CTS and NT treatment was 19.4, 12.1 and 13.4% higher than that under CT treatment, respectively. Moreover, during the 3-year study period, the CPMI under NTS treatment was the largest (139.26, 140.97, and 166.17). Consequently, we suggest that NTS treatment was more sustainable strategy over other investigated conservation tillage practices and should be recommended as climate mitigation technique under climate change context.
Similar papers
Effects of irrigation, crop residue mulch and nitrogen management in maize ( Zea mays L.) on soil carbon pools in a sandy loam soil of Indo-gangetic plain region
Chatterjee et al. · 2018 · CATENA
8 shared concepts
12 findings1 site
Conservation tillage enhances the sequestration and iron-mediated stabilization of aggregate-associated organic carbon in Mollisols
Han et al. · 2024 · CATENA
12 shared concepts
23 findings1 site
Recycling Agricultural Residues as Straw and Hydrochar for Improved Soil Carbon Management Under Contrasting Irrigation Conditions
Wang et al. · 2025 · Agronomy
6 shared concepts