International Journal of Agronomy · 2025
Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Viability Under No‐Tillage and Conventional Tillage in the Lower Mississippi Delta
Anapalli, S. S., Partson, M., Pinnamaneni, S. R., Reddy, K. N., Corser, J. K.
Export
Comparing Soybean Productivity, Soil Health, and Economic Vi…
Abstract
No‐tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location‐specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4‐year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm‐size plots (∼1.25 ha) focused on comparing soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.) yield and soil health benefits of an NT system with a conventional tillage (CT) system in silt loam soil. The NT and CT plots were under corn production over the previous 11 years. Compared to CT, in the 0–20 cm layer, soil bulk density ( ρ ), total nitrogen (TN), and soil organic carbon (C) increased, but field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K fs ) decreased in the 10 cm below the soil surface under NT. Higher ρ was also noticed in the 10–30 cm soil. There were no significant differences between NT and CT in water stable aggregate stability for 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 mm aggregate classes. While the higher ρ and lower K fs under NT can potentially restrict plant root expansion, the beneficial effects of C and TN appear to make up for those adverse effects, culminating in comparable seed yield returns. Over four years, soybean seed harvested from NT (5440 kg ha −1 ) was 1% less than CT (5480 kg ha −1 ). Therefore, adopting the NT system increases net returns by reducing tillage‐associated expenses without compromising soybean yields in the Lower Mississippi Delta region, which can improve soil and water conservation.
Show all
No‐tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location‐specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4‐year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm‐size plots (∼1.25 ha) focused on comparing soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.) yield and soil health benefits of an NT system with a conventional tillage (CT) system in silt loam soil. The NT and CT plots were under corn production over the previous 11 years. Compared to CT, in the 0–20 cm layer, soil bulk density ( ρ ), total nitrogen (TN), and soil organic carbon (C) increased, but field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K fs ) decreased in the 10 cm below the soil surface under NT. Higher ρ was also noticed in the 10–30 cm soil. There were no significant differences between NT and CT in water stable aggregate stability for 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 mm aggregate classes. While the higher ρ and lower K fs under NT can potentially restrict plant root expansion, the beneficial effects of C and TN appear to make up for those adverse effects, culminating in comparable seed yield returns. Over four years, soybean seed harvested from NT (5440 kg ha −1 ) was 1% less than CT (5480 kg ha −1 ). Therefore, adopting the NT system increases net returns by reducing tillage‐associated expenses without compromising soybean yields in the Lower Mississippi Delta region, which can improve soil and water conservation.
No‐tillage (NT) management protects soil from wind and water erosion and improves soil health. Uncertainty in farm production under location‐specific NT practices poses challenges to adopting it by the farming community. To address this challenge, a 4‐year study (2019–2022) was conducted on farm‐size plots (∼1.25 ha) focused on comparing soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.) yield and soil health benefits of an NT system with a conventional tillage (CT) system in silt loam soil. The NT and CT plots were under corn production over the previous 11 years. Compared to CT, in the 0–20 cm layer, soil bulk density ( ρ ), total nitrogen (TN), and soil organic carbon (C) increased, but field‐saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K fs ) decreased in the 10 cm below the soil surface under NT. Higher ρ was also noticed in the 10–30 cm soil. There were no significant differences between NT and CT in water stable aggregate stability for 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 mm aggregate classes. While the higher ρ and lower K fs under NT can potentially restrict plant root expansion, the beneficial effects of C and TN appear to make up for those adverse effects, culminating in comparable seed yield returns. Over four years, soybean seed harvested from NT (5440 kg ha −1 ) was 1% less than CT (5480 kg ha −1 ). Therefore, adopting the NT system increases net returns by reducing tillage‐associated expenses without compromising soybean yields in the Lower Mississippi Delta region, which can improve soil and water conservation.
Similar papers
Long-term crop rotation diversification enhances maize drought resistance through soil organic matter
Renwick et al. · 2021 · Environmental Research Letters
8 shared concepts
28 findings1 site
Effects of No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage on Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Fine Textured Soils under Winter Wheat
Castellini et al. · 2019 · Water
8 shared concepts
5 findings2 sites
Soil Physical Properties and Soybean Yield as Influenced by Long-Term Tillage Systems and Cover Cropping in the Midsouth USA
Nouri et al. · 2018 · Sustainability
7 shared concepts