Is anaerobic mineralizable nitrogen suitable as a soil quality/health indicator?

Soil organic matter (SOM) and especially its labile fractions such as particulate organic matter (POM) are very sensitive to soil use and strongly influence soil ecosystem services. Particulate organic matter has been proposed as a soil quality/health indicator but its determination is tedious and time consuming (i.e. manhours). Anaerobic mineralizable nitrogen (AN) is closely related to the soil organic fraction and is very easily determined. Therefore, we proposed to evaluate AN as a soil quality/health indicator through the assessment of its relationship with SOM, POM, soil aggregate stability (AS), and maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) relative yield (RY) under different long term soil uses for cropping at Balcarce, Argentina (37º 45’ 14’’ S, 58º 17’ 52’’ W). Soil samples had been taken at two depths (0-5 and 5-20 cm) in the fall of 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 from a long term tillage system (TS, conventional (CT) and no-tillage (NT)) and nitrogen fertilization (NF, with and without nitrogen as fertilizer) experiment on a complex of Typic and Petrocalcic Argiudolls. Carbon contents in SOM (SOC), POM (POC) and AN were determined in all soil samples, whereas AS was determined in other soil samples taken in 2006, 2009 and 2012 from the arable layer (0-20 cm). Regardless of TS and NF, SOC, POC and AN decreased with time under cropping at both 5-20 and 0-20 cm. In the uppermost layer (0-5 cm) decreases of all three variables were observed only under CT. Anaerobically mineralized nitrogen variation related to SOC (R<sup>2</sup> 0.59 - 0.78, <em>P </em>< 0.05) and especially POC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80-0.85, <em>P </em>< 0.05) variations. Likewise, changes in maize RY related better (R<sup>2</sup> 0.92 and 0.95 (<em>P </em>< 0.05) for CT and NT, respectively) to variation in AN, than to SOC and POC variations. Besides, changes in the aggregate mean weight diameter (DMWD) related acceptably to AN at 0-20 cm (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.67, <em>P </em>< 0.05) and much better at 0-5 cm (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.86, <em>P </em>< 0.05). Both coefficients of determination were higher than those obtained relating DMWD to SOC or POC. Given the easiness of its determination, its sensitivity, and that it relates to the variation of different key soil parameters and crop behavior, AN could be proposed as an effective soil quality/health indicator. However, studies should be carried out taking into account a broader range of soil and management situations in order to validate the trends observed in this work.