Plant and Soil · 2018
Three dimensional characteristics of biopores and non-biopores in the subsoil respond differently to land use and fertilization
Zhang, Z., Liu, K., Zhou, H., Lin, H., Li, D., Peng, X.
Export
Three dimensional characteristics of biopores and non-biopor…
Abstract
Background and aims Soil macropores consist of biopores and non-biopores, which are different in morphological features and ecological functions. We aimed to separate biopores and non-biopores and investigate the response of their three-dimensional (3D) characteristics to land use and fertilization. Methods Intact soil cores sampled from the subsoil (20– 30 cm) under a combination oftwo land uses, paddy and upland fields, and three fertilization treatments, no fertilizer (Control), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and chemical fertilizer plus organic manure (NPKM), were scanned with X-ray computed tomography (CT). A methodology was proposed to separate biopores and non-biopores and the 3D characteristics of the pores were quantified. Results Based on the proposed methodology, soil biopores were well isolated from non-biopores. The volume of the biopores contributed 30.1–58.0% and 66.3– 74.1% ofthe volume ofthe total macropores in the upland and paddy subsoils, respectively. The biopores in the paddy subsoil had a lower mean pore volume (MPV) and mean branch number (MBN), but a larger branch angle than those of the biopores found in the upland subsoil. The porosity, MPV, surface area (SA) and connectivity ofnon-biopores were significantly higher in the upland subsoil than those in the paddy subsoil. The NPKM treatment significantly increased the volume of the large-sized biopores in the upland subsoil and the tortuosity of the biopores in the paddy subsoil, whereas the fertilization effect on non-biopores was minor. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that subsoil biopores and non-biopores can be effectively distinguished according to the proposed methodology and that their 3D characteristics respond differently to land use and fertilization.
Show all
Background and aims Soil macropores consist of biopores and non-biopores, which are different in morphological features and ecological functions. We aimed to separate biopores and non-biopores and investigate the response of their three-dimensional (3D) characteristics to land use and fertilization. Methods Intact soil cores sampled from the subsoil (20– 30 cm) under a combination oftwo land uses, paddy and upland fields, and three fertilization treatments, no fertilizer (Control), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and chemical fertilizer plus organic manure (NPKM), were scanned with X-ray computed tomography (CT). A methodology was proposed to separate biopores and non-biopores and the 3D characteristics of the pores were quantified. Results Based on the proposed methodology, soil biopores were well isolated from non-biopores. The volume of the biopores contributed 30.1–58.0% and 66.3– 74.1% ofthe volume ofthe total macropores in the upland and paddy subsoils, respectively. The biopores in the paddy subsoil had a lower mean pore volume (MPV) and mean branch number (MBN), but a larger branch angle than those of the biopores found in the upland subsoil. The porosity, MPV, surface area (SA) and connectivity ofnon-biopores were significantly higher in the upland subsoil than those in the paddy subsoil. The NPKM treatment significantly increased the volume of the large-sized biopores in the upland subsoil and the tortuosity of the biopores in the paddy subsoil, whereas the fertilization effect on non-biopores was minor. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that subsoil biopores and non-biopores can be effectively distinguished according to the proposed methodology and that their 3D characteristics respond differently to land use and fertilization.
Background and aims Soil macropores consist of biopores and non-biopores, which are different in morphological features and ecological functions. We aimed to separate biopores and non-biopores and investigate the response of their three-dimensional (3D) characteristics to land use and fertilization. Methods Intact soil cores sampled from the subsoil (20– 30 cm) under a combination oftwo land uses, paddy and upland fields, and three fertilization treatments, no fertilizer (Control), chemical fertilizer (NPK), and chemical fertilizer plus organic manure (NPKM), were scanned with X-ray computed tomography (CT). A methodology was proposed to separate biopores and non-biopores and the 3D characteristics of the pores were quantified. Results Based on the proposed methodology, soil biopores were well isolated from non-biopores. The volume of the biopores contributed 30.1–58.0% and 66.3– 74.1% ofthe volume ofthe total macropores in the upland and paddy subsoils, respectively. The biopores in the paddy subsoil had a lower mean pore volume (MPV) and mean branch number (MBN), but a larger branch angle than those of the biopores found in the upland subsoil. The porosity, MPV, surface area (SA) and connectivity ofnon-biopores were significantly higher in the upland subsoil than those in the paddy subsoil. The NPKM treatment significantly increased the volume of the large-sized biopores in the upland subsoil and the tortuosity of the biopores in the paddy subsoil, whereas the fertilization effect on non-biopores was minor. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that subsoil biopores and non-biopores can be effectively distinguished according to the proposed methodology and that their 3D characteristics respond differently to land use and fertilization.
Similar papers
Effects of Root-Induced Biopores on Pore Space Architecture Investigated with Industrial X-Ray Computed Tomography
Pagenkemper et al. · 2015 · SSSA Special Publications
7 shared concepts
1 site
A Comparison of the Differences in Soil Structure under Long-Term Conservation Agriculture Relative to a Secondary Forest
Pires et al. · 2022 · Agriculture
4 shared concepts
11 findings1 site
Earthworm community and soil microstructure changes with long-term organic fertilization
Valdez et al. · 2019 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science
5 shared concepts
6 findings
