Management › Tillage › Tillage system → Properties › Biology › Diversity

Reduced tillage → Species richness

A clear tendency, not consistent

50 %

of 6 studies with a clear result report a significant increase

–

too few studies with numbers for a size

studies · 10 findings

Count each study by

7 studies · 10 findings

What the studies show

3 of 6 studies report a significant increase (50 %, 95 % confidence interval 19–81 %).

By the direction of each study’s results, significant or not: 5 of 5 studies with a direction point up (100 %, 95 % confidence interval 57–100 %; sign test p = 0.062).

↑ 3 increase
↓ 1 decrease
= 2 no effect
? 1 unclear

How large: only 2 studies with numbers, too few for an effect size
Basis: 7 studies, 10 findings; 1 entered by hand, 6 read by the library

Every study counts once, however many findings it reports: one with 40 sampling dates does not outvote ten others. A study with a significant increase and decrease (say at different depths) counts as "both". A first synthesis for orientation, not a substitute for a systematic review.

Where the studies are

goes up
stays the same
goes down
both ways

Through the soil profile

Each layer on its own: a study that reports the topsoil and the subsoil counts in both. Choose a layer to see what goes with it.

goes up
stays the same
goes down
both ways

What makes a difference

The conditions whose levels differ most clearly, each with the outcome that differs most between its levels of at least 10 study layers. Choose a layer in the profile to see them for that layer alone, or a level here to filter by it.

Testing every condition on every study layer…

Along the conditions

Testing every condition on every study layer…